Numerous U.S. states have launched legal actions against Meta Platforms, which includes its Instagram division, contending that they are exacerbating a crisis in youth mental health by nurturing the allure of their social media platforms.

In a joint complaint filed by the attorneys general of 33 states, including California and New York, Meta, which also oversees Facebook, is accused of deliberately misleading the public about the perils associated with its platforms while deliberately enticing young children and teenagers into compulsive social media use for the sake of profit.

Meta’s calculated interest in the younger demographic is well-documented, as businesses have historically seen this age group as an ideal target for consumer engagement. Establishing brand loyalty at a young age can lead to sustained product purchases as these individuals mature. However, the states involved in these legal actions argue that research links the use of Meta’s social media platforms by children to a range of detrimental outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, insomnia, disruption of educational pursuits, and other adverse effects.

Meta expressed its disappointment regarding the lawsuits and criticized the decision of the attorneys general to pursue this legal path instead of collaborating with industry peers to create age-appropriate standards for the numerous applications teenagers use. This recent legal action follows similar suits filed against Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, where concerns about the addictiveness of social media have been raised on behalf of children and educational institutions.

Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has repeatedly defended his company’s approach to managing content that some have found to be harmful. He has countered allegations that Meta prioritizes profit over user safety and well-being, asserting that this is not the case.

In the ongoing lawsuits, Meta could potentially face civil penalties ranging from $1,000 to $50,000 per violation of various state laws. Given the large number of young users on Instagram, this could translate into substantial financial repercussions for the company.

The focus on Meta grew more intense following the disclosure of documents by a whistleblower in 2021, which unveiled the company’s awareness of Instagram’s addictive nature, despite its original design as a photo-sharing application. Additionally, it exacerbated concerns about body image among certain teenage girls.

The joint complaint filed by 33 states alleges that Meta’s strategy aims to maximize the time young individuals spend on their social media platforms, all the while acknowledging these youths’ inclination to seek approval in the form of “likes” from fellow users.

Additionally, the states allege that Meta has breached regulations that forbid the gathering of data from children under the age of 13, and has engaged in deceptive practices by concealing the detrimental effects of their social media platforms. The complaint asserts that Meta failed to disclose its algorithms’ deliberate aim to leverage young users’ dopamine reactions, consequently fostering an addictive cycle of engagement.

Dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure, plays a pivotal role in these addictive processes. The complaint underscores Meta’s reluctance to shoulder responsibility, even in cases involving tragic events, such as the suicide of a 14-year-old girl in the UK, from which the company distanced itself after she was exposed to content related to self-harm and suicide on Instagram.The states also argue that Meta is expanding its detrimental practices into virtual reality, encompassing its Horizon Worlds platform, as well as the WhatsApp and Messenger applications. 

Leave a Reply